Decision Fast
Quadrant scores
See the full quadrantScored with the public quadrant rubric (maturity × capability; bubble = adoption). Revise as evidence lands.
- Maturity3.8/10
Preview release with frozen eval weights; open LoRA + head + inference code on HF, but EVALUATION-PERMISSION only — no general commercial licence asserted.
- Capability6.2/10
Official JevBench (17 Oct): Intelligence 6.1, calibration 75.1, p50 0.058 s.
- Adoption9/100
Brand-new preview; niche interest among cost-sensitive builders — no production footprint yet.
Vendor claims
- 64.07% accuracy on public JevBench 231-item subset (Easy 100%, Standard 77.78%, Hard 39.64%)[Vendor claim — not independently verified]
- p50/p95 local latency 59.78/60.70ms encoding+forward+calibration on RTX4090[Vendor claim — not independently verified]
- Peak VRAM 1.48GiB, peak RSS 1.93GiB — memory-efficient for edge/budget deploys[Vendor claim — not independently verified]
publicado (OK do Fabricio 17/10 BRT). Board audit of 17 Oct 2026: see the “Board audit” section below; where it conflicts with older board statements on this page, it wins.
Decision Fast is an ultra-cheap 0.6B decision model from FlyMy.AI — LoRA adapter + pointer head on Qwen3-0.6B-Base (checkpoint qwen3_06b_headfirst_ep2a_v53, 606M params / ~10.6M trained) — not a TypeSafe product and not a production release.
One forward pass: state + typed question (choice, score, noul → catalog boolean) in, calibrated probability distribution out — no output tokens, no decode loop. Weights: flymy-ai/decision-fast-preview. The repo includes the LoRA adapter, structural-token rows, pointer head, and executable inference code.
Why it matters: ultra-low cost
At ~$0.0063 per 1,000 decisions (JevBench v1.4.2 cost metric: 76.1), Decision Fast ties Kev 0.5B/0.6B as the cheapest decision model in the benchmark. For high-volume, cost-sensitive workloads where calibration quality is secondary, this is the entry point.
| JevBench v1.4.2 | Score |
|---|---|
| Overall | 32.5 (#33) |
| Intelligence | 37.1 |
| Calibration | 65.3 |
| Speed | 81.6 |
| Cost | 76.1 |
Trade-off is clear: you get ~$0.006/1k decisions, but the Hard-task accuracy drops to 39.64% and calibration lags behind larger models. For volume routing, soft labels in pipelines, or pre-filtering before a heavier model, that may be the right trade.
Limits (read before you ship)
- Preview / evaluation only —
EVALUATION-PERMISSION.mdgrants benchmark runs; a general commercial weight licence is not asserted. - Backbone is 0.6B; JevBench #33 overall means this is not a frontier model — transfer to hard OOD tasks will be weak.
- Calibration score (65.3) is lower than most peers; fit temperature on your labels if confidence matters.
- Training mixture includes ~96 SNI/Gigaword-derived records with unresolved upstream entitlement; see
provenance-review.json. - 4096-token packing limit — long state text may be truncated.
- Sibling of Decision 2B (not yet in catalog); Fast uses the earlier v7 mixture, not the H8/H9 Fable additions.
Run locally
python -m venv .venv && . .venv/bin/activate
pip install torch==2.8.0 --index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu128
pip install numpy==2.1.2 -r requirements-minicpm.txt
python model.py --verify-only
import model
decider = model.load() # once per process
result = decider.decide(
"The customer was charged twice.",
{
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "Choose the support queue.",
"criteria": {"billing": "Billing and payments", "technical": "Technical support"}
}
)
print(result["probabilities"])
JevBench harness integration:
git clone https://github.com/fstandhartinger/jevbench.git
git -C jevbench checkout 218511d85c5e9fc3dd12a08fae0e9818ea48bb68
python run_jevbench.py --harness ./jevbench --output ./new-results --price-input-per-million 0.01
Why it is in the catalog
Public LoRA + pointer-head weights with typed decision I/O, documented inference code, and the lowest cost-per-decision tier alongside Kev. Preview status and weaker calibration keep it below Decider, NanoJev, and Kev on maturity/capability — but for pure cost optimisation on high-volume workloads, it is the starting point.
Board audit (17 Oct 2026)
publicado (OK do Fabricio 17/10 BRT). Checked against the official boards on 17 Oct 2026: Decision Index 0.3.2 (data of 16 Oct, 19:00 UTC), JevBench and ImageJevBench live. The boards are separate sources and are never averaged. Older board statements and rankings further down this page are superseded where they conflict with this section.
| Board | Row | Result |
|---|---|---|
| JevBench open weights (live 17 Oct) | Decision Fast | Capability 40.6; Intelligence 6.1; calibration 75.1; p50 0.058 s; $0.0046/1k |
Board-status statements on this page to recheck against the table (may be superseded):
- “At ~$0.0063 per 1,000 decisions (JevBench v1.4.2 cost metric: 76.1), Decision Fast ties Kev 0.5B/0.6B as the cheapest decision model in the benchmark.”
- “Backbone is 0.6B; JevBench #33 overall means this is not a frontier model — transfer to hard OOD tasks will be weak.”
Score update (audit, 17 Oct 2026). Capability 5.0 → 6.2, first full working (the earlier score had no stored breakdown) = types 10 × 0.30 + calibration 5 × 0.25 + latency 7 × 0.25 + accuracy 1 × 0.20 = 6.20 → 6.2. Types from decisionTypes; calibration from the JevBench axis 75.1 (≥90 → 7, 85–89.9 → 6, 75–84.9 → 5, 60–74.9 → 4, below 60 → 3; no author ECE counted); latency from the board’s self-hosted p50 0.058 s without p99 (≤0.25 s → 7, ≤0.5 s → 6, ≤1 s → 5, above → 3); accuracy JevBench Intelligence 6.1 ÷ 63.6 × 8 = 0.8, half-up. Maturity and adoption unchanged.
Hugging Face on 17 Oct (flymy-ai/decision-fast-preview): 0 downloads, 0 likes, licence tag none, last modified 2026-09-23.
