WeMM-JEV-27B
Quadrant scores
See the full quadrantScored with the public quadrant rubric (maturity × capability; bubble = adoption). Revise as evidence lands.
- Maturity4.8/10
Apache-2.0 full fine-tune of Qwen3.8-27B (26.1B, 11 safetensors shards) with its own D3 engine, HTTP server and Decision Index adapter. No hosted API, integrations or SLA.
- Capability7.9/10
Decision Index 0.4.1 (29 Oct) Full 68.49 (#8 of 247), ECE 0.051, median 98 ms, p95 1.08 s. Choice, yes/no (noul) and score over text and images. No calibration method published.
- Adoption1/100
Rover00/WeMM-JEV: about 315 downloads and 1 like (31 Oct); a mirror (mwei/WeMM-JEV) appeared on 31 Oct. No integrations or production users found.
Vendor claims
- Card reports public Decision Index 0.3 scores of 69.37 (text) and 77.97 (vision), with detailed results in a separate dataset[Vendor claim — not independently verified]
publicado (curadoria autônoma 31/10 BRT). Scores are calculated from scratch.
What it is
WeMM-JEV is a 27B multimodal decision model fine-tuned from Qwen3.8-27B by the Hugging Face user Rover00. You send a state (text, plus images if you want) and typed questions; it returns a probability for every option in one forward pass per question. It ships its own inference package (D3Engine), an HTTP server and an adapter for the Decision Index kit. Source: Hugging Face · results dataset.
A second copy, mwei/WeMM-JEV, appeared on 31 Oct with the same card and file layout. We treat Rover00 as the source.
Board results
| Board | Row | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Decision Index 0.4.1 (data 29 Oct) | WeMM-JEV-27B | Full 68.49 (#8 of 247), public 69.37; ECE 0.051; median 98 ms, p95 1.08 s |
| JevBench (v1.8.1, 30 Oct) | WeMM-JEV | Measured on the 27 Oct draw, shown unranked until that draw is equated |
Not on the Artificial Analysis Decision Index (31 Oct). The boards are separate and are never combined.
Vendor claims (UnverifiedClaim)
- The card reports public Decision Index 0.3 scores of 69.37 for text and 77.97 for vision. The text figure matches the board’s public split; the vision figure is the author’s own run.
Scores (from scratch, 31 Oct 2026)
- Capability 7.9 = types × 0.30 + calibration × 0.25 + latency × 0.25 + accuracy × 0.20 = 10 × 0.30 + 6 × 0.25 + 7 × 0.25 + 8 × 0.20 = 3.00 + 1.50 + 1.75 + 1.60 = 7.85 → 7.9. Types 10: choice, yes/no and score. Calibration 6: board ECE 0.051, no published method. Latency 7: board median 98 ms, but p95 1.08 s (same step as other ~100 ms board medians). Accuracy: 8 × 68.49 ÷ 59.22 = 9.25 → capped at 8 (one board, not #1).
- Maturity 4.8 = availability × 0.30 + docs × 0.25 + integrations × 0.25 + support × 0.20 = 7 × 0.30 + 7 × 0.25 + 2 × 0.25 + 2 × 0.20 = 2.10 + 1.75 + 0.50 + 0.40 = 4.75 → 4.8.
- Adoption 1 = engagement × 0.35 + ecosystem × 0.35 + production × 0.30 = 1 × 0.35 + 1 × 0.35 + 0 × 0.30 = 0.70 → 1.
